The Davenport Foundation

The operation has not provided TB Tests and Medical Records.

The operation has not provided proof of orientation being completed.

The operation has not provided signed child rights.

Four child records were missing the orientation.

Child records were missing TB tests and medical documentation.

A child's initial service plan was completed 4 days late.

Child records did not have documentation of advance notice to parents regarding the initial service plan meeting.

A child's initial plan was not signed /dated by professional service provider.

Three child records had their 72-hour plan completed late.

One child record was missing their written copy of child rights. Two child records had the copy but no child participation was noted.

In a child's admission assessment, it was found that the information from the child's psychological evaluation was not included.

Two children were missing TB Tests.

In a child's admission assessment, it was noted that the child's behaviors were missing from the admission assessment.

Upon conducting follow up inspection to determine compliance, the agency did not have an update/addendum that stated or reviewed the homes' ability to provide treatment services.

In a review of a serious incident report, it was found that a child exposed himself, made lewd remarks, and kissed another child in the home. This was not reported to Licensing.

Upon conducting follow up inspection to determine compliance, no update/addendum was provided for the adult child interviews.

Two child records did not contain a copy of the signed child right's form.

In a review of a foster parent training, the foster parent is missing First Aid.

Upon conducting follow up inspection to determine compliance, it was found that two homes are still listed as Emergency Care Services.

Upon conducting follow up inspection to determine compliance, no update/addendum was provided for the joint interview conducted with both foster parents.

In a review of child files it was found that documents were being back dated. Additionally, in a review of a service plan, the wrong child's name was listed on the first page.

In a review of background checks, it was found that a closed home still had an active background. The home closed 6/15/2024.

In a review of a closing summary, there was no statement of whether the agency would recommend the foster home for future verification.

Incident Report does not contain the child's age, gender, and the other children involved in the incident.

In a review of two home studies, it was found that adult children were not interviewed, nor a documentation of attempts.

In a review of a home study, it was noted to be missing the family group interview.

In a review of floor plans, it was noted that two were missing dimensions, and all four were missing the specification of indoor areas for children use.

One foster parent agreement was missing the agency signature.

In a review of a home study, it was missing a family member interview. It was noted that an adult son did provide a reference, but an additional family member is needed.

In a review of a home study screening, it was found that a household member was not included in the screening with the required information.

In a review of home studies, it was found that the home study did not state or review the homes' ability to provide treatment services.

In a review of licensed it was noted that they are licensed to provide Emergency Care Services as well as Transitional Living Services. The operation does not have these services on their permit.

In a review of a home study, it was found that there was no joint interview conducted with both foster parents.

The home study was not signed nor dated by the child placement management staff.

The foster parent agreement was signed 10 days after the home was licensed.

One adult child of the foster parent was not contacted as part of the home screening process.

Upon conducting follow up inspection to determine compliance, it was found that the new title/position for the staff member does not meet the requirements for a home developer/recruiter. The tasks that are listed also included tasks that are to be completed/performed by the child placement staff. The staff member does not meet these qualification as noted in inspection #3975200.

Upon review of staff files, it was found that staff were allocated more training hours in a day than feasible. It was noted that one staff member completed over 40 hours of Pride Pre-Service Training as well as attended a 16 hour training course in a single documented day. Another staff member was also noted on the date of hire to attended a16 hour training course, as well as administer a 40 hour training program to another staff.

Upon review of a staff file, it was found that the operation's case manager does not meet the professional qualifications as set by minimum standards, option 2.

The agency mock files do not contain a suitable form for documenting administration of medication.

In a review of the operation's weapon and firearm policy, there was no statement or criteria to show how it will be determined if a child can use any weapons, firearms, explosives, projectiles, or toys that explode or shoot.

The administrator's personnel file does not include signed and dated statement acknowledging responsibility to report suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation. In addition, the administrator's personnel file did not include statement signed and dated by the employee documenting a copy of the operational policies has been read.

In a review of the policies submitted, there is no policy regarding the use of tobacco products and e-cigarettes for children, caregivers, and other adults. Related standards to review: 749.1931(a)-(c)

The agency's policy and procedure does not have documentation of date of adoption nor effective date.

In the operation's policy, a statement is needed regarding employees and that they are not to delegate the responsibility to make a report and that the operation is to not require an employee to seek approval to file a report or notify that a report was made. In addition, a review of the operations mandated reporter form, it states that the employee is to report to a program supervisor, director, and to the CEO where the alleged abuse occurred within 24 hours of becoming aware of the incident.

In a review of the discipline policy, there was no information regarding how the operation will utilize trauma informed care into the care, treatment, and management of each child. It is recommended that the operation implement the practices recommended in the trauma informed care trainings into their care of the children placed in their homes.

The administrator's personnel file does not contain a notarized Licensing Affidavit for Employment.

In a review of the operation's policy, there was no noted fees and fee schedule including information regarding birth/parent expenses. It is also necessary that the operation include additional information as set forth by standards 749.197(b) and 749.197(c).

In a review, it was noted that there is policy regarding possessions and where they may be stored, however there is no information regarding search policies.

A review of the agency's child mock file shows the file contains a common application from a current CPS case. The common application has been altered, however, still contains current CPS case ID and other confidential and identifying information. A review of the agency's child mock file contains another child and parent's court documents. This agency is a newly established agency and should not have confidential CPS records in their files. In a review of the mock foster home record, it was found that there is a home study for a currently licensed foster home with another agency. The home study contains confidential information about the home and couple. This agency is a newly established agency and should not have confidential records from other agencies in their files.

In a review of the operations legal risk policy, there was no information regarding the certain criteria that will be used to ensure that the child is the most appropriate fit for the placement.

The operation's policy does not address how staff are qualified to administer screening tools. (what makes them qualified; how did they get qualified, etc). In order to utilize the screening tool, an individual must complete an online training on how to administer the screening tool and have documentation showing the individual is qualified to administer that screening tool. The operation should identify within the suicide policy the designated online training resource for being qualified to administer screening tool.

There were no noted adoption services policy's regarding adoptive parents. The agency has applied to provide adoption services, the following standards need to be met in the agency's policies: - 749.131(1) - 749.131(1)(A) - 749.131(1)(B) - 749.131(1)(C) - 749.131(2) - 749.131(3) - 749.131(5) - 749.131(6) - 749.131(7) - 749.131(8)

In a review of the operation's policies, the abuse and neglect policy regarding the following standards was found to be missing: - 749.135(1) - 749.135(2) - 749.135(3) - 749.135(4) - 749.135(5)

The operation plans to provide adoption services, this standard needs to be addressed and added to the operation's policies.