Rekindle
218 N COLLEGE AVE, TYLER, TX 75702
License #1790326- 16331 | Expires: Oct 3, 2024
Compliance Summary
Inspection History
| Date | Type | Result | Violations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2025 | OTHER | Compliant | 0 |
| Mar 31, 2025 | OTHER | Violations Found | 4 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | Annual Inspection | Compliant | 0 |
| Mar 11, 2025 | Annual Inspection | Compliant | 0 |
| Mar 3, 2025 | Annual Inspection | Violations Found | 7 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | OTHER | Violations Found | 1 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | Annual Inspection | Compliant | 0 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | Annual Inspection | Violations Found | 2 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | Annual Inspection | Violations Found | 1 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | Annual Inspection | Violations Found | 9 |
| Jul 10, 2024 | Annual Inspection | Violations Found | 5 |
| May 14, 2024 | Annual Inspection | Compliant | 0 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | Annual Inspection | Violations Found | 4 |
Violation Details
ReKindle copy/pasted multiple sections of the home screening from the prior CPA to include: -Household floor plan references 2 bedrooms although the home was modified to a 3 bedroom. -Former CPA Weapons/Firearms policy -Home study recommendations and overall evaluation from the former CPA employee
Corrected: Apr 4, 2025
The home screening did not include interviews with any of the children residing in the home at the time of verification.
Corrected: Apr 4, 2025
The home screening completed by ReKindle did not identify the home concerns shared by the former CPA, specifically the history of a CCR home closure recommendation nor steps to mitigate the risks to children.
Corrected: Apr 4, 2025
The foster home is verified to provide care for five children ages 0-17, to include treatment services for Primary Medical Needs. However, the home screening recommendation is for 2 children ages 4 - 13 and notates the Foster Parent does not feel equipped to work with children who are non-ambulatory, physically challenged or medically fragile.
Corrected: Apr 4, 2025
In one of the home screenings, there was no explanation on how the foster mother dealt with her past trauma of sexual and physical abuse.
Corrected: Mar 17, 2025
One of the four home screenings reviewed was not original for Rekindle.
Corrected: Mar 19, 2025
On one home screening, there was no discussion on the foster parents willingness to respect and encourage a child's religious affiliation, No discussion on willingness to provide a child with opportunity for religious and spiritual development if desired.
Corrected: Mar 19, 2025
In one of four family files read, no TB tests had been completed.
Corrected: Mar 19, 2025
Two of the four homes were missing current pet vaccinations.
Corrected: Mar 12, 2025
On one home screening, there was no discussion on how the income was verified.
Corrected: Mar 19, 2025
The floor plans for one home did not show dimensions of the residence.
During the inspection, the foster mother's father entered the home with one of the children in care. Foster mother indicated both her parents visited the home daily for dinner. Foster mother shared she believed the agency was working on the parent's background checks.
One child who was placed with Rekindle for 54 days did not have an initial service plan. Two additional children's plans , while not yet due, are lacking important information (medication, dental, culture, basic needs, intellectual development, PMN needs, etc)
Two of the child files reviewed did not contain non-emergency admission assessments.
One of the four child files was missing a child rights form. The additional child right documentation did not include a space for the child to sign (if of age).
In the review of four children's service plans, two did not include a plan for maintaining the child's relationship with their biological family or for visitation arrangements.
During the initial inspection, four child records were reviewed. Of the four records, three were non-emergency placements which require admissions assessments to be completed prior to placement. It was observed all three placements contained admissions assessments completed after placement.
In the cultural section of the service plans, there is no mention of the children's ethnicity and maintaining their cultural norms.
Upon reviewing a discharge record, it was noted that the discharge summary did not include the circumstances leading to the discharge.
In one child's file, there were conflicting admission dates on various forms, another child's race/ethnicity was inconsistent, and two children had incorrect agency names on their forms.
In one child's file read, there were no service plan invitations to parents, and in two other files, the invitations were late.
One of the four child records read contained a 30-day medical exam that was 11 days late.
The review of a discharge summary revealed a lack of explanation for the child's discharge and no mention of the child's response to being discharged.
In the review of four children in care, it was found that two required suicide screenings; however, these were not documented in the files.
The home screening did not include summaries of any adult children interviews, and the joint interviews were not documented in either study.
In one home screening, there was no interview of the mother's 31-year-old adult child.
The health status of the adult children home members was not included in one of the home screenings.
In one of the home screenings reviewed, there was no 10-year residential history noted for the family.
In one study, the adult children/home member interviews are not present - with regards to their attitudes about their parents fostering more children.
The policy manual states that services will be provided to newborns through the age of 22, that services are provided for Trafficking Victims, and that Transitional Living Program Services are provided.
10 areas in the Policies and Procedure manual had incorrect wording regarding Tapkard, Inc. or Minimum Standard numbers for CPAs (748 rather than 749). This was noted on: Record Keeping, Child Care 749.113, Professional Staffing Plan, above the Treatment Director job description, pg. 75 regarding legal fees for adoptions, Verification of income for ado homes, Ado parent rights, Kids in school- #10, CPA admin purpose, and Case Manager general responsibilities. The Disaster/Fire drill log references another Child Placing Agency.
The children are expected to attend church with foster parents. If they prefer another church and that church cannot provide transportation, the child is expected to attend church with the foster parents. This is against child rights. A child cannot be forced to attend church. If they refuse to go, arrangements must be made to accommodate that child.
During the standard-by-standard inspection, I observed the Transfer/Closing Summary of Foster Home missing a section for pending investigations.
Nearby Facilities
Data is provided as-is from public government records. It may not reflect changes since the last inspection.